{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"In Abstract","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.mub.eps.manchester.ac.uk\/in-abstract","author_name":"Nicholas Parker","author_url":"https:\/\/www.mub.eps.manchester.ac.uk\/in-abstract\/author\/nicholasparker\/","title":"Adjoint representations of black box groups \\[PSL_{2}\\left ( F_{q} \\right )\\] - In Abstract","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"AY0zwV9lCU\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.mub.eps.manchester.ac.uk\/in-abstract\/adjoint-representations-of-black-box-groups\/\">Adjoint representations of black box groups \\[PSL_{2}\\left ( F_{q} \\right )\\]<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.mub.eps.manchester.ac.uk\/in-abstract\/adjoint-representations-of-black-box-groups\/embed\/#?secret=AY0zwV9lCU\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"&#8220;Adjoint representations of black box groups \\[PSL_{2}\\left ( F_{q} \\right )\\]&#8221; &#8212; In Abstract\" data-secret=\"AY0zwV9lCU\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.mub.eps.manchester.ac.uk\/in-abstract\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/61\/2018\/03\/Adjoint-representations-of-black-box-groups-PSL2FqV2.jpg","thumbnail_width":890,"thumbnail_height":350,"description":"Searching for a needle in a haystack, which, in its turn, is locked in a big black box Researchers at the Universities of Manchester and Istanbul have solved an important problem of computational algebra, first posed in 1999, which was viewed by mathematicians around the world as absolutely impenetrable. Assume you do all calculations in [&hellip;]"}