In March we will be discussing the impact of media coverage of major nuclear disasters, asking how this affects the image, or public perception, of the nuclear industry. New Hitchhiker, PhD student Connaugh Fallon, gets things started with a perspective on Fukushima, before and after a nuclear education.
Public perception of the nuclear industry is inevitably shaped by the media and this is never more prevalent than in the event of a nuclear disaster. The relationship between the nuclear sector and the media has historically been clouded, with the secrecy that overshadowed the infancy of the nuclear era still lingering in the minds of many. The accident at the Fukushima Diiachi nuclear power plant (NPP) in 2011 was the second greatest nuclear disaster after the explosions at the Chernobyl NPP in 1987, with both of these occurrences being rated as level 7 (the highest) on the International Nuclear Event Scale (INES).1 Whilst there are many crossovers between these two incidents, there is a notable evolution in how the news was conveyed to the public. Following the accident at Chernobyl, the chief source of information was the mainstream media in television and print. However, the political climate of the age and the controlled press in the USSR resulted in delayed and distorted information, leading to a great level of uncertainty and mistrust.2
Conversely, the Fukushima disaster occurring 24 years later received mass media coverage, with a vast amount of information being uploaded and shared through the internet and social media. More traditional forms of journalism also intensively covered the disaster, with attempts to inform the public on the extent of radiation leakage and the threat this may pose to the general public. Indeed, many broadcasts featured an interview with a scientific expert and talks with local residents about their experience on the ground.3 From a personal standpoint I believed the coverage to have been thorough and instructive, but frightening.
Since starting a PhD in radiochemistry research, many years after Fukushima, I’ve noticed the enigmatic view of nuclear I used to have falling away. Although it’s been said many times before, this boils down to personal understanding. I notice myself becoming more critical of nuclear in the media and the messages they portray, because I myself am more well informed about the processes involved and the dangers posed. It seems obvious to me that having clear lines of communication between authorities and the public is essential for the development of the nuclear industry and whilst the media coverage of the Fukushima disaster shows a progressive change, i.e. more interviews with leading scientists, many corners of the media, and perhaps most corners of the internet, are where the challenges in ensuring that information is reliable and clear remain.
2 S. M. Friedman, Bull. At. Sci., 2011, 67, 55–65.
3 N. Imtihani and Y. Mariko, Procedia Environ. Sci., 2013, 17, 938–946.